Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

xFrom Bible Belt to Sun Belt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism by Darren Dochuk (The Post War Era, Religion)

From Bible Belt to Sun Belt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism
by Darren Dochuk 

The Post War Era
Religion

Thesis:


Specific examples/evidence that supports the thesis:


Summary:
From Bible Belt to Sun Belt tells the dramatic and largely unknown story of "plain-folk" religious migrants: hardworking men and women from Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas who fled the Depression and came to California for military jobs during World War II. Investigating this fiercely pious community at a grassroots level, Darren Dochuk uses the stories of religious leaders, including Billy Graham, as well as many colorful, lesser-known figures to explain how evangelicals organized a powerful political machine. This machine made its mark with Barry Goldwater, inspired Richard Nixon's "Southern Solution," and achieved its greatest triumph with the victories of Ronald Reagan.

What does this tell us about Religion in the Post War Era?


What parts of the book can be applied to lectures?

General Thoughts:

Excerpts from Book Reviews
 " the economic and cultural transformation of Southern California from the 1930s to the 1980s that led to the nationwide dissemination of the conservative views that influenced the rise of the Christian Right in American politics. As such, it is as much a regional history as it is a volume on religion and politics."

"George S. Benson (president of Harding University and instrumental in its National Education Program), John Brown (founder of several educational institutions in Arkansas and California as well as of a prominent evangelical radio station in Southern California), and George Pepperdine (founder of the Western Auto nationwide chain of automotive specialty stories and Pepperdine University) created a network of media outlets, educational institutions, and evangelical Christian organizations that proved to be the catalyst for the emergence of the Religious Right in national politics."

"The vast majority of evangelical Christians in Southern California adopted the premillennial view that individual salvation required personal commitment and constant vigilance against the creeping socialism of the liberal establishment and the threat of a worldwide communist takeover that would stamp out conservative Christian institutions."

"In Dochuk’s telling, we have here the roots of the Religious Right, and there is no question that the American Left has savaged those with religious commitments, to its own detriment. But the Left’s failure is not nearly enough to explain why American evangelicalism has been so easily captured by right-wing corporate capitalism, militaristic nationalism, and the prosperity gospel. That is to say, how do we get from antebellum evangelicalism, with its plethora of socially progressive reform efforts, to the contemporary and reactionary evangelicalism of Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, and the Tea Party?"

"A pivotal point in Dochuk’s narrative comes in 1945–1946, when a peculiar old age welfare scheme ($30 scrip weekly to every unemployed Californian over age fifty) was resurrected. At this time California’s southern evangelical transplants were equally suspicious of “corporate capitalism and the bureaucratic state” (p. 80), and this “Ham and Eggs” proposal provided an alternative to “the industrial unionism and progressive liberalism that animated the Left, and the strident antistatism that energized the Right” (p. 92). The arrival of the rabidly anti-Semitic Gerald L. K. Smith in behalf of the Ham and Eggers helped convince Social Democrats that this proposal was the manifestation of reactionary, fundamentalist religion. The result was violent confrontations between the two groups and the defeat of Ham and Eggs. More importantly, this conflict ensured that southern evangelicals in California would choose the Right and its “united Christian, conservative front” over a Left that “sympathized with their economic plight but vilified their religion” (p. 101).


My Highlighted Passages

“Sunbelt evangelicals” were changing American politics, helping “win the governorship for Ronald Reagan in 1966, the South for Richard Nixon in 1972, and ultimately the country for Reagan’s Republican Party in 1980”

Monday, July 7, 2014

A Godly Hero: The Life of William Jennings Bryan by Michael Kazin (Progressive Era, Politics, Religion)

A Godly Hero: The Life of William Jennings Bryan 
by Michael Kazin 

Progressive Era
Politics
Religion

Thesis:
While the legacy of William Jennings Bryan is mixed, the author argues for his impact as a moral crusader and brilliant turn of the century orator who rewrote the rules of politics.
Bryan was never elected into office, in fact he seldom held an office except a stint as Secretary of State. He was a beloved politician but failed to negotiate the field well enough to gain election.
An ardent Christian, he fought against big business, seeing himself as Jeffersonian by principle, honoring the average man.
Specific examples/evidence that supports the thesis:


Summary:
Bryan focused his education and career around becoming an incredible orater, this brought him into law. He enjoyed the court room 

What does this tell us about Religion in the Progressive Era-WWI?
In 1925 the Scopes trial, Bryan prosecuted a substitute teacher for teaching evolution in class. The trial was widely discussed as religion in education was a contentious issue. Bryan was actually called to the stand by the defense and had to defend his belief that the bible was factual despite the scientific questions it brings up. In the late nineteenth century, the second great awakening spurring a huge movement toward religiosity from most American people, in the Scopes trial you can observe this being phased out as people began to see industrial and capitalist growth bringing about increased quality of life for the average person.
The author also felt that after Bryan passed on, the fundamentalist Christian right took a huge hit, they lost their spokesperson and their leader in politics. They wouldn't find another for a long time.

What does this tell us about Politics in the Progressive Era-WWI?
Bryan spoke to the people. People loved him. He made a living giving speeches and sometimes multiple in one day. He had a huge amount of fans and one might expect this to translate into support for candidacy, so why then did Bryan fail to get elected to president of the US 3 times? Bryan was passionate and refused to back down on his moral convictions, this often meant he couldn't get funding or support from any big business. In his first run for President, companies said that if he were elected they would be forced to lay off a significant part of their labor force because of Bryan's support of lifting tariffs. It also seems that his religious fervor was not always well accepted by the voters.
Bryan's passionately conducted, self-written, brilliant speeches changed how politics was done. He was the inspiration behind
What parts of the book can be applied to lectures?

General Thoughts:
Bryan's argument against teaching Darwin in school was more around the social implications of the theory that were prominent at the time. As promoter of peaceful resolution to problems and a man who wanted his country to avoid war, he saw the way Darwinism was being used to justify violence in the world and did not want that perpetuated and given more merit by being taught to children. He also, obviously, disapproved of how Darwinism discounted the bible's story of creation but that was only part of his argument.
Excerpts from Book Reviews


My Highlighted Passages
But in the mid-1890s, most Americans assumed that wealth consisted largely of products that were tangible and visible—crops, livestock, iron, coal, textiles, real estate. When calamity struck, they naturally fell to arguing whether the fault lay in a surplus or shortage of the shiny commodities, or specie, on which their dollars were based. Because creditors, industrialists, and the Bank of England favored gold, ordinary Americans who resented their power, and often found it mystifying, rallied to the promise of free silver. They were groping for a flexible currency, tailored for a fast-growing economy, but they trafficked in the argot of conspiracy.
But his immediate task was to flesh out the assault on corporate wealth, to turn the Democrats’ new power into a boon for the majority of American voters who either earned wages or owned a farm or other small business.
What ensued was the greatest rush of reform legislation in U.S. history until the New Deal, one inspired by Bryan’s speeches and the party platforms he’d been drafting since 1896.
he recoiled at any research in biology or geology that denied the supernatural. The acceptance of such work, he believed, opened the door to every manner of immoral behavior, from defiance of the Volstead Act to a lust for war. 34 Surprisingly, he could cite two influential disciples of Darwin to back up his fears. Early in the Great War, Vernon Kellogg, a Stanford professor who wrote widely about evolution, spent several weeks with German scientists who had become officers on the kaiser’s general staff.
democracy. Taxpayers should prevent the public schools they financed from teaching “atheism, agnosticism, Darwinism, or any other hypothesis that links man in blood relationship with the brutes.” Nonbelievers were free, of course, to say whatever they liked in their own private schools, just as Christians did in their sectarian institutions. But the public schools, free and open to any child, should refrain from promoting either a single faith or none at all. Wasn’t that the American way?

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The Seventies: The Great Shift in American culture, Society, and Politics

The Seventies: The Great Shift in American culture, Society, and Politics
By Bruce Schulman

Thesis: The long seventies (1968-1974) have had a profound impact on the conservative leaning of America today. This decade began the religiously inspired, Sunbelt, small government conservatism that still exists today. Also Reagan’s legacy of increasing US military budget and intervention in world affairs, persist today.

Summary:
Schulman exhibits his thesis during several chapters that discuss:
1969-1976
-Nixon’s Presidency disillusions American’s about politicians and big government.
-Issues of racism take a new form, as ethnic identities struggle for differentiation and respect, instead of integration, diversity is to be respected.
-American’s search for spiritual fulfillment and spur the 3rd great awakening
-The south and the West rise to power politically, economically, and culturally
1976-1979
-The Carter Admin. faulters along with economy. The era of stag flation. Consumerism explodes as money continually loses value. Americans become credit based.
-Culturally, Americans are disenchanted and anti-authoritarian sentiment rises, giving way to punk music and dark films/tv
-Women fight to extend their roles as equals in society and deny the traditional home role. Man likewise, rise against the John Wayne stereotype, and embrace emotions/family life.
1979-1984
Reagan’s administration promises a war on taxes and claims to minimize the federal gov. Meanwhile they increase the national debt and military budget while intervening in world affairs.
However, the Cold War also ends soon after and America is restored as a world power of influence.

What does this tell us about Gender in the 1970's - Present day?
The 1970’s signaled a major shift in gender relations. Women took a stand against their traditional roles in the home and joined the work force and politics. They also fought against the idea that they were any better suited for family/home duties than men. Laws around divorce and abortion changed. Men also shifted their ideology and became more involved in family life and less relied upon as the sole breadwinner of the family. Male fulfillment shifted from financial and career success to other sectors.

What does this tell us about Race and Ethnicity in the 1970's - Present day?
The rise of the South. Southern egregious racism had been squelched by federal law, so the racist backwards reputation of the South was finally being overcome. Issues of racism take a new form, as ethnic identities struggle for differentiation and respect, instead of integration, diversity is to be respected.
From African Americans and the Civil Rights Movement spurred a general sense of ethnic identity amongst minorities. During Carter’s administration an inquiry into the internment camps of World War II resulted in reparations to Japanese Americans. This era spurred the affirmative action reform in colleges but started as a government requirement to have minority’s quotas for companies that received government contracts. Civil companies followed suit and hired diversity specialists. The American Indians embraced their culture and became more politically active, disputing broken treaties with the US gov, including taking over Alcatraz Island because it was unused American gov property.

What does this tell us about Religion in the 1970's - Present day?
Disillusioned Americans started to examine their spirituality. The communes of the 1960’s faded away or became more mainstream alternative living groups. The American passive Protestant attitudes shifted to more hardline evangelical ideals. Religion became more mainstream. The third great awakening brought many Americans back to the church and longing for the old days of America, causing a resurgence in the mainstream popularity of country music (associated with the south) and Christian mainstream music like “Spirit in the Sky”.

What does this tell us about Politics in the 1970's - Present day?
The author argues that the present day conservative stand on government and the shift away from FDR’s New Deal strategies of government intervention all stem from this era. Starting with the disgust of Nixon’s stunning immoral political manipulation and over law breaking, to frustration with Carter’s inability to stabilize the economy and the massive inflation rates along with increasing government oversight and programs, and finally with Reagan’s appeal to reduce taxes and federal government programs. The American people began to long for the gold old days when state government played the biggest role and presidents were spokesmen to maintain US power abroad. The South and the Western US rose to power, and the traditionally NE dominated government dissolved.

The rise of the South. Southern egregious racism had been squelched by federal law, so the racist backwards reputation of the South was finally being overcome. With the rise of industry, the space program, military installations, and the elderly moving south, population began to soar.



What parts of the book can be applied to lectures?
Interesting stuff……
Country Joe, Hippies Song “Vietnam Song”
The first Rambo displays the disillusionment the American people suffered as a result of the failure in Vietnam. Rambo II is symbolic of Reagan’s Admin and how he determined to no longer have our hands tied and to go full force to win the Cold War through intervention in many countries. There was the name “Ronbo” given to Reagan and his head put on Sly’s Rambo poster.


Resurgence in the mainstream popularity of country music (associated with the south) and Christian mainstream music like “Spirit in the Sky”.
1984 Year of the Yuppie, time magazine

General Thoughts:
Altomont Vs. Woodstock-> Made the hippies seems like a potentially violent group, no longer mellow protestors
Nixon told America what they already knew, that the president was a corrupt political position. It didn’t really change the public opinion of government. Confidence was already waning
The rise of the South. Southern egregious racism had been squelched by federal law, so the racist backwards reputation of the South was finally being overcome. With the rise of industry, the space program, military installations, and the elderly moving south, population began to soar. The third great awakening brought many Americans back to the church and longing for the old days of America, causing a resurgence in the mainstream popularity of country music (associated with the south) and Christian mainstream music like “Spirit in the Sky”.
THE REAGAN ADMIN:
The first Rambo displays the disillusionment the American people suffered as a result of the failure in Vietnam. Rambo II is symbolic of Reagan’s Admin and how he determined to no longer have our hands tied and to go full force to win the Cold War through intervention in many countries. There was the name “Ronbo” given to Reagan and his head put on Sly’s Rambo poster. Reagan’s admin became involved in Grenada, El Sal, Nica, Lebanon. It was clear that America supported Reagan’s power stance as long as no US soldiers were do the fighting. Reagan dramatically increased military spending.
However economy was one of the big issues, his administration had to face. He first blamed Carter (that’s original) and then set forth to do massive cuts to government spending. Cut taxes, cut spending.

Excerpts from Book Reviews: 
2 Major Shifts
1. “The decade transformed American politics and culture in two critical-and several lesser-respects. Most significantly, the South "rose again." During the 1970s, Schulman explains, the balance of political power shifted to thriving Sunbelt states in the South and the West and "the South's historic policy prescriptions-low taxes and scant public services, military preparedness and a preference for state and local government over federal supremacy-came to define the national agenda"
2. “The triumph of the market as "the favored means for personal liberation and Cultural Revolution" (p. 257). The 1970s saw a marked decline in trust in the federal government, as many Americans turned instead to the private sphere and what Schulman calls "an unusual faith in the market"
“Schulman starts his narrative with a fascinating chapter on Richard Nixon, depicting the president as a man who earned the nickname "Tricky Dick" by systematically undermining liberal programs without ever publicly attacking them. Using the examples of federal funding for the arts, low-income housing, and environmental programs, as well as the never-implemented Family Assistance Plan, Schulman demonstrates how Nixon seemed to support traditional liberal issues while simultaneously undermining the liberal power base.”

My Highlighted Passages: 
This impression could hardly be more wrong. The Seventies transformed American economic and cultural life as much as, if not more than, the revolutions in manners and morals of the 1920s and the 1960s. The decade reshaped the political landscape more dramatically than the 1930s. In race relations, religion, family life, politics, and popular culture, the 1970s marked the most significant watershed of modern U.S. history, the beginning of our own time.109

Americans developed a deeper, more thorough suspicion of the instruments of public life and a more profound disillusionment with the corruption and inefficiency of public institutions.170

Increasingly, all sorts of Americans, even those with dreams of radical reform, looked to the entrepreneur and the marketplace as the agent of national progress and dynamic social change.178

A new ethic of personal liberation trumped older notions of decency, civility, and restraint. Americans widely embraced this looser code of conduct.183

mayhem-filled years, from 1969 to 1984, the United States experienced a remarkable makeover. Its economic outlook, political ideology, cultural assumptions, and fundamental social arrangements changed.212

Nixon even conceded that “I am now a Keynesian in economics.” He embraced the idea that a humming economy was the responsibility of the federal government and that the White House should actively intervene in economic affairs, carefully calibrating the policy controls, to ensure robust growth and low unemployment. Nixon even dispensed with the gold standard, that most reassuring symbol of conservative fiscal orthodoxy.729

Watergate only intensified Americans’ alienation from public life: their contempt for the secrecy, inefficiency, and failures of “big government.”1131

But the general trends bolstered conservatives. The ultimate lesson of Watergate remained “you can’t trust the government.”1352

President Jimmy Carter represented a more conservative faction of the Democratic party: southern, fiscally responsible, suspicious of labor unions and government regulation. 861354

Along with the bonfire of political power, the Sunbelt boom ignited a cultural revival—the strongest reassertion of southern cultural identity and regional pride since the Civil War.2831

By the early 1970s, embarrassment over segregation had faded away, and the South rejoined the national mainstream on questions of race relations.2833

On the one hand, the worst excesses of southern racism had been outlawed, and African Americans began voting in southern elections.2833

Their beliefs and resentments created a potent political force. Sunbelt conservatives accomplished what Sixties radicals had only dreamed of: they captured a political party and won control of the White House.2915

Demi-rednecks formed the foundation for conservative populism, the tax revolt, and the Reaganite assault on the welfare state.2916

In Grenada, El Salvador, and Angola, it appeared that Reagan and the United States had reclaimed world leadership,5288

States lacked the wherewithal—the unchallenged economic hegemony that had underwritten the ambitious interventionism of the early cold war. After 1945, the war-revved U.S. economy so outperformed its exhausted allies and defeated enemies that Americans could afford economic sacrifices for political or strategic objectives.5319

The Reagan administration would send soldiers and sailors into combat, Weinberger explained, only if the operation had a clear objective, if the circumstances permitted the United States to marshal sufficient firepower to finish the job quickly, and if the intervention received overwhelming public support.5336

Richard Viguerie rightly labeled Reagan “a reverse Teddy Roosevelt”—a leader who spoke loudly and carried a small stick. 235351

Maintaining public approval often took precedence over standing tall. The heart of the president’s program—the centerpiece of the Reagan Revolution—was an attack on big government—the5456

“In the present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”5458

They could not fulfill Reagan’s promises of tax cuts, rearmament, and a balanced budget, at least not without massive cuts in public services.5644

Experiments in communal life and spiritual renewal had disbanded or become conventional. Rap, with its militant lyrics and contempt for racial integration, competed with country, the most conspicuous component of a southernized national culture, for control of the airwaves.6077

During the Seventies, national power shifted south and west.6096

Drawing strength from its burgeoning population and booming economy, the South and Southwest wrested control of national politics.6100

The South’s historic policy prescriptions—low taxes and scant public services, military preparedness and a preference for state and local government over federal supremacy— came to define the national agenda during the Seventies and have remained the motive forces in American public policy ever since.6105

Religion, especially the frank expression of personal spirituality, assumed a public and powerful role in American life.6112

Over the past two decades, entrepreneurship has replaced social and political activism as the source of dynamic cultural and political change in the United States.6124

The digital revolution only reinforced the conviction that technology and entrepreneurship empowered ordinary people and inspired cultural and political innovation.6133

Seventies emphasis on authenticity and freedom, on political transformation through personal liberation. But the market—in particular, starting new businesses—became the favored means for personal liberation and cultural revolution.6147

changes in attitudes, remain potent. The long, gaudy, depressing Seventies reinvented America. We live in their shadows.
Nixon wanted to destroy the liberal establishment by stripping it of its bases of support and its sources of funds.
But the era, and its climactic twelve months, have also been recalled, as “the Year the Dream Died”—the year, to quote one journalist, “when for so many, the dream of a nobler, optimistic America died, and the reality of a skeptical conservative America began to fill the void.”
Nixon also pioneered what came to be called devolution—transferring authority from the federal government to state and local governments and from the public sector to the private sphere.
Watergate was unique; it forever altered the way Americans understood politics and the presidency, the way they reported and discussed national politics, the way they conceived, investigated, and understood wrongdoing by government officials.
If one date delineated the end of the Sixties and the beginning of the Seventies, it was the year 1968.